<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plain bad language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/plain-bad-language/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/plain-bad-language</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan Barnwell</title>
		<link>http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/plain-bad-language/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Barnwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/?p=2546#comment-753</guid>
		<description>Even in this webpage, there is the awful phrase &quot;fit for purpose&quot;.
 In consumer law, there was, and may still be, the statement that anything for sale should be &quot;fit for its purpose&quot;. A Member of Parliament once used the phrase without the possessive pronoun, which hurts me every time I hear or read it. It seems to have entered the language shorn of the pronoun. Am I at fault, and  is that actually correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even in this webpage, there is the awful phrase &#8220;fit for purpose&#8221;.<br />
 In consumer law, there was, and may still be, the statement that anything for sale should be &#8220;fit for its purpose&#8221;. A Member of Parliament once used the phrase without the possessive pronoun, which hurts me every time I hear or read it. It seems to have entered the language shorn of the pronoun. Am I at fault, and  is that actually correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
