Fossil words of yore in the offing

Posted by on June 24, 2013

© Photodisc / GettyAt some point we’ve all given someone short shrift, or they’ve given us short shrift, meaning “a firm and immediate refusal to do something in a sympathetic way”. Apart from this transaction, though, we’ve probably never done anything else with shrift – Macmillan Dictionary’s definition shows that it normally appears only in that sole phrase. As Arika Okrent recently wrote: “We might not know what a shrift is anymore, but we know we don’t want to get a short one.”

Similarly, we may wait with bated breath for something in the offing, but it’s unlikely that anything else in our experience is ever bated, or that we’ve made any other use of the noun offing. (Unless we’re sailors; offing can mean the part of the deep sea visible from the shore.)

These words are known as fossil words, because although they are no longer productive in the language – their creative capacity is not in fine fettle – they have been preserved in set phrases, idioms and contexts. Like physical fossils, they offer a glimpse of earlier times, throwing a light on language from days of yore.

English has quite a few fossil words, testifying to the effectiveness of the expressions that have housed them from time immemorial. They don’t always monopolize the word in question: searching for immemorial we find other uses extant (e.g., “an immemorial philosophical problem”), but the fossilised use predominates.

In other cases, the fossil is the sole survivor or virtually so. Petard occurs almost exclusively in the expression hoist with/by your own petard, meaning “suffering as a result of your attempt to harm someone else”. Many people use it without knowing (or needing to know) that petard is an obscure word for a type of explosive. Consider this exchange in Maya Kaathryn Bohnhoff’s story Simple Gifts:

“Can’t we just let Vlad and his ego get hoist by their own petard?”
Rhys eyed him wryly. “Do you even know what a petard is, Roddy?”
“No, but you’re not going to let him get hoist by one, are you?”

And it’s not just words that get fossilised: phrases and sentences do too, like if need be, come what may, and be that as it may. Lines such as “Till death do us part” and “Long live the Queen/King” also stand a good chance of long-term preservation because they are closely tied to ritual or tradition, while proverbs can last centuries by dint of their storing a piece of wisdom or common sense that applies to everyday situations. We all have a few fossils at our beck and call.

Comments (16)
  • Interesting. You’ve reminded me of words that get fossilized as “orphan negatives”, and a story in the New Yorker entitled “How I Met My Wife”, which resuscitates the positives. It begins:
    “It had been a rough day, so when I walked into the party I was very chalant, despite my efforts to appear gruntled and consolate. I was furling my weildy umbrella for the coat check when I saw her standing alone in a corner. She was a descript person, a woman in a state of total array. Her hair was kempt, her clothing shevelled, and she moved in a gainly way. I wanted desperately to meet her, but I knew I’d have to make bones about it, since I was travelling cognito. ….” And so on. I have the full text but no exact details.

    Posted by Gill on 24th June, 2013
  • Gill: The essay is by Jack Winter, and it’s a comic delight – as is the phrase “orphan negatives”, which was new to me. (I’ve mentioned Winter’s piece on my blog a couple of times, most recently in a post about (un)kempt.)

    Posted by Stan on 24th June, 2013
  • Thanks for the reference. I was thinking too about your “hoist…petard” example – this kind of picking-apart of extremely fixed collocations is a great resource for humorists. Wodehouse does it a lot, e.g when B Wooster says “I decided to keep my lip stiff and upper”.

    Posted by Gill on 24th June, 2013
  • [...] At Language Log, Geoff Pullum discussed the long-awaited split infinitive at The Economist. At OxfordWords blog, Simon Thomas rounded up five words that are older than we thought; at The Week, James Harbeck looked into four very old words for very new things; and at Macmillan Dictionary blog, Stan Carey offered some fossil words of yore. [...]

    Posted by This Week’s Language Blog Roundup: passings, weird spelling, cocktail names | Wordnik on 28th June, 2013
  • [...] We don’t know what a shrift is but we don’t want a short one. Stan Carey on fossil words [...]

    Posted by I’ve got your missing links right here (29 June 2013) – Phenomena: Not Exactly Rocket Science on 29th June, 2013
  • [...] Found via Fossil words of yore in the offing [...]

    Posted by Without the prefix (or should that be “with the pre”?) | The k2p blog on 30th June, 2013
  • I always thought that the phrase was “beckon call”, or “Beckoning call”, because that tended to make a little bit more sense in the context used. Does the verb “to beckon” come from the phrase, or is the phrase itself an old misspelling that has become common throughout the english language ?

    Posted by JJ Bang on 30th June, 2013
  • JJ: Beck came about by shortening beckon, centuries ago, so they’re closely tied by etymology. Beckon is a very old word in its own right, related to beacon.
    You’re not the only person to interpret beck and call as beckon call, as the Eggcorn Database shows.

    Posted by Stan on 1st July, 2013
  • Petard comes from the French word peter – meaning to fart. To be hoisted by one’s own petard conjures up an amusing image.

    Posted by KJF on 2nd July, 2013
  • [...] via Read the rest by Stan Carey here: Fossil words of yore in the offing | Macmillan. [...]

    Posted by Fossil words of yore in the offing | peoples trust toronto on 2nd July, 2013
  • KJF: That’s true, and it does. As a child one of the words I used for it was the onomatopoeic bang, which I associate now more with non-biological kinds of explosion.

    Posted by Stan on 3rd July, 2013
  • “Short shrift” and “hoist by your own petard” were coined by Shakespeare as were many other apt phrases. If you’ve had “cold comfort” or “too much of a good thing”, if you refuse “to budge an inch” or if you are “tongue-tied”, “hoodwinked” or “in a pickle” you are quoting Shakespeare.The same applies if you are “a tower of strength”, “bloody-minded”, if you “lie low”or refer to say, a wind farm as an “eyesore”.

    Posted by Paul Hale on 16th July, 2013
  • Paul: Certainly Shakespeare was the first to put “short shrift” and “hoist by your own petard” (or rather a form of them) in writing. Though I wouldn’t go so far as to say that anyone using the phrases is quoting him.

    Posted by Stan on 18th July, 2013
  • […] Linguistic fossils offer a glimpse of times gone by. […]

    Posted by Nuggets From Afar | Jean Zimmerman on 28th September, 2013
  • I’ve been studying English lexical fossils for a while, and a freely available paper of mine can be found via the following webpage: http://www.lingref.com/cpp/hel-lex/2012/index.html

    Posted by Stephen Coffey on 10th October, 2013
  • Stephen: Thanks very much for the link. I’ve downloaded your paper and look forward to reading it.

    Posted by Stan on 11th October, 2013
Leave a Comment
* Required Fields Notify me of follow-up comments via email